In Which I Explain How President Obama Made it Legal to Slaughter Horses in the USA . . .
And how we plan to fight it from our little farm here in Bethany . . . again . . .
Earnestly Seeking Galileo is a 2,000-pound horse that lives with us on Locket’s Meadow Farm. On Monday evenings Ernie carefully carries Steven, a special needs adult, who has been riding him for almost five years. Steven is autistic, but he rides independently while we blast rock and roll and sing at the tops of our lungs. We have a dozen other riders like Steven in our Star Rider’s group, and we all agree that Monday is the best night of our week (despite my abysmal singing voice.)
Nine years ago, Ernie was an 8-month old colt slated to ship to an American slaughterhouse where he would have been killed and processed into meat for human consumption in the Asian and European market. Instead, I bought him by the pound (despite the arbitrary ban my husband, David, had put on getting any more horses – silly man) and booked a trailer to bring him home.
I buy all my horses by the pound. They come from slaughter yards and kill pens and PMU ranches. They arrive thin, scarred, scared and traumatized. We shower them with love and kindness, cure their infections, rehabilitate and train them for a new job. Some are too tired and broken to ride, but we’re fine with that – we coddle them and let them live as long as they like. They are our friends and companions and we love each and every one.
I am against the slaughter of horses, and alongside thousands of others worked for years to ban it in our country. We won that battle, and in 2008, President Barack Obama pledged to keep the ban on horse slaughter permanent. On November 18, Obama lost my last remaining sliver of respect for him when he signed a bill that allows the return of horse slaughter plants to the United States. I am still shell-shocked.
The arguments for and against slaughtering horses are intense and impassioned; for those arguing for it, it’s all about the money. In fact, one of the greatest proponents of horse slaughter is the American Quarter Horse Association (AQHA.) Quarter horses are bred at a rate of about 140,000 a year. There is no market for 140,000 horses total, never mind quarter horses. Why so many? Because out of every 200 or so foals born, a breeder might get one that will be worth a quarter million dollars. What happens to the rest? Off to auction by the thousands where they are bought in bulk lots by “killer buyers” and shipped to slaughterhouses. Not only is it a cheap way to dispose of “inferior” animals, it’s profitable.
How does AQHA phrase their position? They like to say it keeps the country from becoming overpopulated with horses. Hello??? Hellooooo? Encouraging overbreeding causes overpopulation! DUH! When numbers of unwanted dogs and cats reached crisis proportions, they didn’t build more gas chambers to euthanize them. Instead, hundreds of organizations sprang up to encourage spaying and neutering and educate people about the horrors of overpopulating the country with house pets. Why aren’t horses afforded the same courtesy? Because there is no money in killing dogs and cats, but as long as Belgians will pay $20 for a pound of horsemeat, well, need I say more?
Thousands of horse lovers worked tirelessly to make this slaughter end, at least in this country where we don’t eat horses and view them as companion animals. We won the battle, but apparently we grew complacent, dropped our guard, believed our president was telling the truth, and lost the war. Now it’s time to recommit to the fight – once more into the breech, I cry!
If I had a million acres and a billion dollars I would rescue every one of them, but that doesn’t solve the problem (and since three rich men from Greenwich won the last big Lotto pot I need another plan . . . sigh . . . ) My animals keep me close to the farm, so there is no going to Washington to lobby for change. But what I can do is help dispute the claim that horses in feedlots and auction yards are junk horses with no future. It’s a lie manufactured to cover up the fact that the very people who profess to love horses are often most responsible for their deaths, because the fact is, they only love “perfect” horses that can fetch a huge price tag or win a small fortune on the race track. The rest are little more than by products of the industry and therefore, dead meat.
You might ask, and many do, why am I so fanatical about horses? What about all the other animals that go to slaughter? Before you start shouting “hypocrite,” our farm is not exclusive to horse rescue. We save all kinds of farm animals including pigs, cows, sheep, goats . . . we don’t discriminate, and we love them all. I’ve been a vegetarian for 30 years and avoid animal products to the best of my ability. However, my mother always said my first word was “horsy” and I imagine it will be my last, as well. My horses go above and beyond the call of duty for me whenever I ask, and to my dying day I will do the same for them.
For David and me, our lives are our animals. We are awake long before the sun rises and head outside to feed and water. We clean their stalls, blanket them, give them injections when they are sick, train them and coddle them. When they are too old and frail to survive a long winter, we hold them and tell them how much we love them while they are peacefully put to sleep, and then we help lower them into their graves. They make us laugh until we cry, and cry until we laugh. We are not armchair warriors; we are in the trenches fighting this battle every day, one horse at a time, and will never quit.
Our lives are simple. We take no vacations, buy no luxury items and wear our clothes until they are tattered. For us there is no money in horses, but there is lots and lots of love. Each morning we watch the sun rise over Locket’s Meadow and marvel at how lucky we are, and at night we gaze at our horses bathed in moonlight and smile. No one is more blessed than we are. No one.
So in response to this new development in the slaughter industry I have decided that I must tell the stories of our very special horses that would have been served up on a dinner plate many years ago if we hadn’t intervened. It’s time for everyone, including President Obama, to learn that these animals have a face and a story, and any one of the thousands being slaughtered every week could have been spared and become the very special horse that carries Steven on Monday nights . . . if only more people had known the truth.
Next week: The story of Captain, the "bad" colt that many said deserved to die, but survived to change the lives of lonely, struggling children.
Kathleen Schurman and her husband David Melina own Locket’s Meadow farm in Bethany, CT, where they have rescued hundreds of horses from slaughter. Kathleen is the author of two children’s books about the rescues on their farm; “The Long Road Home” tells the story of Earnestly Seeking Galileo and “Captain of the Dance” is about the very special and gifted Captain.
Yooper
2:15 pm on Thursday, December 1, 2011
No pun intended, but isn't your "beef" with the American Quarter Horse Association (AQHA)? Seems like putting "President Obama" in the headline is just a way to attract attention.
I think you have barely touched on one of the biggest issues in this country. Too many things are motivated by and done for the almighty dollar.
Chico Little
7:40 pm on Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Was it confusing? Her "beef" is the overbreeding of hundreds of horses to find just one that's half a second faster. As for President Obama, he SINGED THE BILL -- breaking his promise of just two years ago to stand against slaughter. I think that's pretty newsworthy, especially since every time a baby sparrow fell out of a tree on the last president's watch, he was not only blamed for it but had maliciously pushed the bird.
I'm sorry you're so blindly loyal President Obama so much you won't hold him accountable for this. This is certainly NOT the change I voted for. This vote slaughtered my support.
Chico Little
7:41 pm on Wednesday, December 7, 2011
And by the way, it's been my experience that people who use the phrase "almighty dollar" never do the work they do for free. If you hate dollars so much, please, send them to a horse rescue organization.
Mike
3:24 pm on Thursday, December 1, 2011
Yooper has got it right- there are plenty of, let's say, 'unsavory' things that go on every day, but they might be 'job creators' so, I guess they're okay?
Mia Cav
5:14 pm on Thursday, December 1, 2011
You are wonderful, Kathleen! Yes, the AQHA has their heads up their collective buts, however, if Barry didn't sign the legislation and vetoed it, the issue would be at an end (or back to Congress for another try). The buck stops at the POTUS.
Kathleen Schurman
6:22 pm on Thursday, December 1, 2011
Yooper and Mike - the trouble with horse slaughterhouses (aside from my obvious "beef" with the killing of horses for food) is that they create very few jobs, even less tax revenue and are an environmental nightmare. They are owned by foreign interests, not Americans, who are notorious for not paying any taxes. When Obama signed that bill he was bowing to special interest groups, period. Not to bore you with details, cause I can obviously go on for days on end, but here's one of the shortest articles I could find that spells out the details. http://www.animallawcoalition.com/horse-slaughter/article/1887
Yooper
7:25 pm on Thursday, December 1, 2011
You seem to be dodging my point. Your link took me to "page not found", but a look at some of the other postings on that site seemed like special interest rants trying to conflate transportation of horses with slaughter of horses. If I didn't understand them it must be because I didn't have a lawyer to decipher them for me. I did get the clear sense that they, like you, were trying to politicize the topic as a way to get attention. The comment from JJ shows that you are succeeding, but I don't know if that will benefit horses in any way.
I hope you realize that YOU represent a "special interest group" and that nothing in Washington or Hartford or Bethany is free of "special interest groups".
I don't criticize your concern for horses, but I think your tactics are poorly chosen.
Chico Little
7:43 pm on Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Amen. Rep. Burton estimated about 100 jobs were created. And in any case, are we really so desperate for any jobs that we'll create them from the blood of horses? You could create 100 jobs for people to go around gelding horses, surely -- and who are going to get these jobs? Who's going to want to stand hip-deep in horse entrails 7 days a week, 8 hours a day killing these animals? PhDs? Or illegal migrants?
Judy Johnson
6:35 pm on Thursday, December 1, 2011
I am against the slaughter of horses. President Barack Obama should be working with the people on how to make jobs for them all the company's that have close up due to him. I did vote for him But Trust me he will never get my vote again I hope he doesn't get in for the next four years. He's all about himself and how he can put more money in his pockets.
Yooper
7:34 pm on Thursday, December 1, 2011
Another viewpoint on the topic. Interesting take from PETA.
http://eatocracy.cnn.com/2011/11/30/horse-coming-soon-to-a-meat-case-near-you/?hpt=hp_c2
Kathleen Schurman
8:09 pm on Thursday, December 1, 2011
While I admire PETA's idealism, I don't support their tactics, and have found their statistics exaggerated on many occasions - in the past they've doubled the numbers of PMU horses sent to slaughter each year, and that was my area of research and expertise. I could care less what PETA has to say. Of course, even if there were only two people like me, we would be a special interest group. That goes without saying. But every poll has shown that no less than 70% of the USA is against horse slaughter. That's a big special interest group. What we don't have is a pack of well-paid lobbyists. Really, it's incredibly complicated and would take weeks to look at all the angles - transportation alone is an unwieldy topic, and for a while it was hoped that if transport of horses for slaughter purposes across US borders could be halted, the problem would be solved. In the end, the quarter horse people want a cheap way to dispose of their excess horses, as do the thoroughbred people, etc. The foreign horse meat companies want to meet the demands of their market, and the American public gains nothing. For the record, I voted for Obama and had high hopes, but so far, am disappointed and not just about the horses. And my "tactic" is simple - these horses have faces, names and personalities. One of the most pervasive pro-slaughter arguments (justifications) is that they are junk horses, useless to anyone. I have 40 horses on this farm that prove this theory dead wrong.
Ruth Beardsley
5:06 pm on Friday, December 2, 2011
If you want to be mad at someone/something, be mad at Congress. The House and Senate drafted and passed this bill, not President Obama. And they attached it to another very important bill, on federal deficit reduction, I believe. If the President had vetoed the bill, the whole thing would have been vetoed. The whole country would have suffered. So write to your Senators and Representatives, folks, if you want action on this. They are the culprits.
pat
8:20 pm on Thursday, December 1, 2011
President Obama, please undo this. These are animals with personalities and affection for their handlers. They are lovely animals that have served humans from the beginning of their time on Earth with us. They have real emotion and feel affection for one another and for us. This is declaring war on them.
Chico Little
7:46 pm on Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Ruth, the President SIGNED the bill and his party in "Congress" supported it overwhelmingly and in greater numbers than the opposition. He broke his pledge. Like Springsteen says, "Blind faith in the government or anything will get you killed." In this case, it's getting horses killed .
Congress didn't have the numbers to override a veto on this. They could have passed it, but it doesn't become law without the president's signature.
He let us down.
kma
10:02 pm on Thursday, December 1, 2011
Thank you Kathleen for all of your hard work. Imagine for a moment if everyone felt like some of your critics. "A critic is very often a non doer. That is someone who sits back and waxes philosophically about how it is that the doers are doing." I'm involved in dog rescue and pay no mind to negativity. It can only serve to dilute what you are doing. Ignorance and apathy are almost as much crimes as animal abuse. Know that when you meet your maker you will stand tall knowing you gave your heart and soul for another of God's creatures.
Jodie
1:17 am on Friday, December 2, 2011
While I appreciate those who rescue horses, I happen to agree with this ban lift, and for once, PETA. I myself own two horses, one of which is a rescue (not a slaughter house rescue), and I still support this. There just isn't enough rescues to save everyone and unfortunately, we all have to die at some point. Instead of going after this law, we should be going after backyard breeders that are the main reason for this problem. With the amount of free horses and the amount of full rescues, what are we suppose to do with all these horses? I'm not saying it's right, I'm saying it's logical. Jack, my rescue horse, was starved along with another because the owner couldn't afford to feed him. There are TONS of horses out there slowly starving to death or just left (CO has 60% abadonment rate) because owners can't afford to feed them and no one has the means to take them. How about instead of trying to ban something that really does benefit us in several ways, why not attempt to make it more humane? I'd rather see a horse slaughtered here in the U.S. where we have the power to make the rules stricter then sent off to Mexico, which includes a nice long trailer ride, where they truly just don't care. Like I said, we should be going after the smaller problems before going for the throat. Like getting rid of backyard breeders, making it harder for them to breed horses, or the companies that support the PMU, making stricter laws. This ban should've been lifted a while ago.
Chico Little
7:48 pm on Wednesday, December 7, 2011
It'll just lead to more over-breeding, more abandoned horses, and more slaughter; not less. These horses aren't born by magic. More suffering now and more in the years to come. I refuse to believe the best we can do for horses is to slaughter or to not slaughter, because that's just not the case.
Kathleen Schurman
9:06 am on Friday, December 9, 2011
A gentleman named Mark sent this message: "Hello Kathleen. I like your point about educating people about horses the way we have educated them about dogs and cats and over breeding. I have seen a lot of horses in my travels that were labeled at one time as used up or useless. I know of one beautiful thoroughbred named Levi that was bought at a slaughter auction. He is a wonderful horse and was lucky enough to get a second chance at life. I encourage anyone who reads this article who knows of a horse that was saved to tell their story. There are many of them out there." Yes, Mark. There are so many and I would love it if readers would share their stories here. Next week I am writing about the beautiful Calliope and her filly Clementine who have touched the hearts of hundreds of people.